Obama Opposes Obama
Would someone please explain a difference in principle between the foreign policy of this administration and the last one?
DECEMBER 20, 2007
SEN. OBAMA: “The President does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not
involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”
MARCH 19, 2011
OBAMA: ‘Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the
United States and the world’
MARCH 19, 2003
BUSH: ‘American and coalition forces are… in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the
world from grave danger’
[This administration takes orders from the UN and embarks on another military adventure into an internal conflict in Libya, which has no
imminent threat to the safety and security of our country and is totally devoid of Constitutional authority]“
Obama is in full agreement with George W. Bush!
How’s that two-party system working for you?
Our elected officials should be taking orders from we, the people, NOT from the United Nations
Call Congress and demand we withdraw our troops
(202) 224-3121
In accordance with the Constitution Party Platform, . . . . . .”We condemn the presidential assumption of authority to deploy American troops into combat without a declaration of war by Congress, pursuant to Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. . . . . .We should be the friend of liberty everywhere, but the guarantor and provisioner of ours alone”.
To read this plank in its entirety, click here.
We go to war by the whims of men now!
When people choose the whims of men over the rule of law,
We lose our liberties and to their desires, we do bow!
Are we too far gone, should we lay down all hope?
No, America! Liberty still burns bright and true, all is not lost.
The Constitution Party, America’s last best hope!