Comments for Constitution Party of Missouri - Changing the Course of a Nation http://cpmo.us Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:15:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Ron Paul & Cynthia Davis by Wendy http://cpmo.us/2012/03/ronb-paul-cynthia-davis/#comment-940 Wendy Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:15:37 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=5120#comment-940 No, she isn't! Not at all. For starters, Cynthia refuses to stand up for Missourians who are chronically ill. She wants to force them to go to the black market to seek their medicine. Cynthia also seems to struggle with the first amendment. What part of CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW does she not understand? She should sit down with Dr. Paul and learn a little bit about individual liberty and the right to pursuit happiness. And by the way, the CP's "porn plank" on the platform makes you guys look like religious zealots rather than people of principle. Again, freedom of expression is just that. You guys talk about the Constitution, then you twist it into your own religious viewpoints. It's just sickening. No, she isn’t! Not at all. For starters, Cynthia refuses to stand up for Missourians who are chronically ill. She wants to force them to go to the black market to seek their medicine.

Cynthia also seems to struggle with the first amendment. What part of CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW does she not understand? She should sit down with Dr. Paul and learn a little bit about individual liberty and the right to pursuit happiness.

And by the way, the CP’s “porn plank” on the platform makes you guys look like religious zealots rather than people of principle. Again, freedom of expression is just that. You guys talk about the Constitution, then you twist it into your own religious viewpoints. It’s just sickening.

]]> Comment on Ron Paul & Cynthia Davis by Brooke http://cpmo.us/2012/03/ronb-paul-cynthia-davis/#comment-820 Brooke Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:02:34 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=5120#comment-820 The Ron Paul supporters threatened violence at the Republican Caucus in St. Charles County. Does Cynthia Davis threaten violence against citizens as well? The Ron Paul supporters threatened violence at the Republican Caucus in St. Charles County. Does Cynthia Davis threaten violence against citizens as well?

]]> Comment on Cynthia Davis on Bott Radio Network by Chris Cantrell http://cpmo.us/2012/01/cynthia-davis-on-bott-radio-network/#comment-614 Chris Cantrell Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:17:37 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=4514#comment-614 I have no respect for Christian Radio Stations that get involved in politics. I have no respect for Christian Radio Stations that get involved in politics.

]]> Comment on Constitutionally Commited Patriots by weldon woodward http://cpmo.us/2011/12/constitutionally-commited-patriots/#comment-469 weldon woodward Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:57:07 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=4473#comment-469 Cynthia is a people type candidate. I look forward to voting for her.... Cynthia is a people type candidate. I look forward to voting for her….

]]> Comment on Platform by Principles of the Constitution Party http://cpmo.us/platform/#comment-286 Principles of the Constitution Party Tue, 08 Nov 2011 06:08:04 +0000 http://www.constitutionpartymo.org/?page_id=268#comment-286 [...] The pre-born child, whose life begins at fertilization, is a human being created in God’s image. The first duty of the law is to prevent the shedding of innocent blood. It is, therefore, the duty of all civil governments to secure and to safeguard the lives of the pre-born.  Read more… [...] [...] The pre-born child, whose life begins at fertilization, is a human being created in God’s image. The first duty of the law is to prevent the shedding of innocent blood. It is, therefore, the duty of all civil governments to secure and to safeguard the lives of the pre-born.  Read more… [...]

]]> Comment on Special Session Continues Attack – China Hub Bill by Call Your State Representative! http://cpmo.us/2011/09/china-hub/#comment-201 Call Your State Representative! Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:16:00 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=4042#comment-201 [...] View previous alerts about the China Hub -> [...] [...] View previous alerts about the China Hub -> [...]

]]> Comment on Cynthia Davis – Announcement Speech by Tenoha Templeton http://cpmo.us/2011/10/cynthia-davis-announcement-speech/#comment-194 Tenoha Templeton Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:52:51 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=4180#comment-194 Cynthia, go for it, we the people are behind you...let us know what we can do, where to send donations, etc. My husband is Mayor of a little town in Southwest Missouri, Galena, MO., and we love you here! Tenoha Cynthia, go for it, we the people are behind you…let us know what we can do, where to send donations, etc. My husband is Mayor of a little town in Southwest Missouri, Galena, MO., and we love you here!
Tenoha

]]> Comment on Get Ready for Victory in 2012! by JLMEALER http://cpmo.us/2011/09/get-ready-for-victory-in-2012/#comment-184 JLMEALER Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:15:38 +0000 http://cpmo.us/?p=4107#comment-184 Not only will you make governor, but I will take the POTUS slot if all goes according to plans. http://mealer2012.com JL MEALER Not only will you make governor, but I will take the POTUS slot if all goes according to plans. http://mealer2012.com

JL MEALER

]]> Comment on Resolution for Opposition to the Fair Tax by JLMEALER http://cpmo.us/2011/05/resolution-for-opposition-to-the-fair-tax/#comment-151 JLMEALER Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:17:30 +0000 http://www.constitutionpartymo.org/?p=3594#comment-151 I am not intending to become a dogma for this post, but here are a few notes: Once we are out of the Economic abyss via the MEALER ECONOMIC INITIATIVE, we must implement the Constitutional 'indirect consumption tax' known as the FairTax HR 25, S 13 according to Art. 1, § 2, Clause 3, § 8, Clause 1, § 9, Clause 4 & 5. Which is by design a more effective and solid approach than the Constitution Party's “State Rate Tax” (in this day and age) SIMPLY because, the SRT will disproportionately affect state's that carry more uncounted heads (aka. illegal aliens), part time residents and either foreign or domestic vacationers, and bares aggression towards Constitutional mandated fairness. (No offense meant!) The CP has valid points on taxing Corporations which are no more than groups of business persons protected through legal personage. Incentives for individuals to create and maintain businesses and jobs as detailed within the Mealer Economic Initiative avoids the Corp tax avoidance issue and we are in complete agreement! I am not intending to become a dogma for this post, but here are a few notes:

Once we are out of the Economic abyss via the MEALER ECONOMIC INITIATIVE, we must implement the Constitutional ‘indirect consumption tax’ known as the FairTax HR 25, S 13 according to Art. 1, § 2, Clause 3, § 8, Clause 1, § 9, Clause 4 & 5.

Which is by design a more effective and solid approach than the Constitution Party’s “State Rate Tax” (in this day and age) SIMPLY because, the SRT will disproportionately affect state’s that carry more uncounted heads (aka. illegal aliens), part time residents and either foreign or domestic vacationers, and bares aggression towards Constitutional mandated fairness. (No offense meant!)

The CP has valid points on taxing Corporations which are no more than groups of business persons protected through legal personage.

Incentives for individuals to create and maintain businesses and jobs as detailed within the Mealer Economic Initiative avoids the Corp tax avoidance issue and we are in complete agreement!

]]> Comment on Resolution for Opposition to the Fair Tax by JLMEALER http://cpmo.us/2011/05/resolution-for-opposition-to-the-fair-tax/#comment-150 JLMEALER Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:09:27 +0000 http://www.constitutionpartymo.org/?p=3594#comment-150 Alright, now I understand WHY the Constitution Party and the FairTax backers differ. Since I am vying for POTUS under the Constitution Party, we might want to clarify as with the docs I have sent that the FairTax is an indirect tax and thus Constitutional. HOWEVER, I do agree wholeheartedly on the Fair Tax being used as a new method of funding extra-Constitutional activities outside the enumerated powers of the General Welfare clause, ignoring the clear intent of the Article I, Section 8 powers of Congress. Let's discuss this further. Alright, now I understand WHY the Constitution Party and the FairTax backers differ.

Since I am vying for POTUS under the Constitution Party, we might want to clarify as with the docs I have sent that the FairTax is an indirect tax and thus Constitutional.

HOWEVER, I do agree wholeheartedly on the Fair Tax being used as a new method of funding extra-Constitutional activities outside the enumerated powers of the General Welfare clause, ignoring the clear intent of the Article I, Section 8 powers of Congress.

Let’s discuss this further.

]]>